First there was Communism, then there was Talibanism, and now there is NGOism
Disclaimer: I am making large generalizations in the following blog-post, so take it with a grain of salt.
I just finished reading several thought provoking and critical
books on the rise of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) called The Crisis
Caravan by Linda Polman and Chasing Chaos by Jessica
Alexander. I am also in the middle of reading Dead Aid by
Dambisa Moyo, A Zambian economist. While I must admit I have been feeling
extremely cynical about humanitarian aid after reading these books, in many
ways they reinforced my experiences observing humanitarian aid from the outside
and inside in Sierra Leone. We often
only hear part of the story so let me tell you a different story that we often
don’t hear.
The number of International NGOs has now exceeded 37,000 and a
capitalist industry has grown up around humanitarian aid as they compete for
the flow of billions of dollars within humanitarian territory. If aid was
a country, the aid industry’s economy would be the 5th largest in the world and
it is the largest unregulated industry in the world with little
accountability.
The question at the center of humanitarian aid is a century old
question of whether to leave or continue providing aid at any price.
Florence Nightingale, one of my childhood heroes, believed that the
"higher the costs of war, the sooner it would end." Voluntary
efforts, which reduced the expense faced by war ministries, merely made it
easier for governments to engage in wars more often and for longer. She
believed that aid failed its purpose if any party used it to their own
advantage. Let me give you a few
statistics of how parties have used aid to their own advantage.
Between 1970 and 1998, when aid flows to
Africa were at their peak, the poverty rate in Africa actually rose from 11% to
a staggering 66%.
In Monrovia, Liberia, according to the Integrated Regional
Information Networks (IRIN), orphanages are big business, where almost 80% of
the so-called orphans are not parentless but have been used to procure external
funding for their own gains. I
personally experienced this both in Nigeria and Sierra Leone.
War Lords, such as Charles Taylor, the Liberian president, who
fueled the civil war in Sierra Leone, taxed all International NGO's 15% of the
value of aid, paid to him in cash, fueling and funding the Rebel United Front
(RUF) in Sierra Leone. The rebel forces in Sierra Leone stated their motivation
for cutting off people’s limbs: without violence and devastation, no aid.
A rebel soldier said "war means waste all resources. Destroy
everything. Then you people (the West) will come and fix it.” The Red Cross recently reported that over $5 million went unaccounted for during the Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone.
According to the UN mission in Southern Afghanistan, 1/3 of food
aid and agriculture support was handed over to the Taliban in 2006. Between
2001 and 2008, during the War on Terror, more than $15 billion was allocated
for aid to Afghanistan, but it is unclear where that money ended up. The former director of the World Bank in
Kabul stated that 35 to 40% of aid was wrongly spent in Afghanistan. During the aid operation for the Kurds in
Northern Iraq, UN humanitarian departments were required to conduct all
transactions in local currency which helped Saddam Hussein’s regime to earn
$250 million in 1992 alone.
During the Ethiopian regime, 20 to 30% of aid supplies valued at
$70 million was seized alongside the heavy taxes that INGO's paid to bring the
aid in. In Somalia, the entrance fee charged by warlords reached up to
80% of the amount the aid supplies were worth.
In October 2013, there was a shipwreck off Libya’s coast where 300
migrants died, which gained international attention, leading the Italian Navy to
launch a rescue operation to help combat migrant smuggling. Their rescue efforts contributed to the
profits of the smugglers, reducing the distance that they had to bring the
migrants, from 160 miles to 12 miles.
The cost of the journey went down, allowing more people to make the
journey, and the profits of the smugglers increased.
For every 10,000 that cross, 37 die. In the West, we see the images that highlight
suffering and hardship, but the pictures migrants see on social media are of
people joyously posing together having successfully reached Europe. According to the Libyan Brigadier Qassem “We
are capable of conducting rescue work…We are fed up with these organizations
(NGOs). They increased the number of
immigrants and empowered smugglers.”
Not only is it questionable whether or not humanitarian aid has
actually helped, there are also other negative consequences of bringing the aid
industry into foreign countries. Polman
stated that wherever aid workers go, prostitution instantly soars and the cost
of living sky-rockets. In Kabul, a foreigner could rent a tiny abandoned
flat for $5,000 a month. In Kabala, Sierra
Leone, rumors spread that Doctors Without Borders recently rented a whole compound
for $50,000 a year, which seems excessive compared to the annual income of $340
for the average Sierra Leonean.
Lavish lifestyles of aid workers don’t go unnoticed by nationals,
perpetuating unhealthy stereotypes of the West.
The salaries, per diems, and
danger-and-discomfort bonuses make working in the established aid sector highly
attractive. I worked for the World Bank
this summer for a six-week project in Sierra Leone which paid $500/day (unfortunately it all went towards my student loans). On top of that, I had a per diem of $40/day
and housing, transportation and flights were covered. This is extremely attractive, especially for
millennials as most of us are swimming in debt.
Polman
said “The humanitarian aid community that travels around to war torn, crisis
ridden countries feels no embarrassment about looking like an international jet
set on holiday. I’ve known aid workers
who cared for child soldiers and war orphans by day and relaxed by night in the
arms of child prostitutes.” Seeing the
behavior of my fellow Westerners in Sierra Leone and Nigeria was appalling and degrading.
I have watched as the best teachers in Sierra Leone have left the
teaching profession to contract hop from NGO to NGO because they get paid
better, draining the education system of qualified teachers. Doctors leave government hospitals because it
is more lucrative to manage a donor project for an NGO. The best and brightest are pulled out of the
very civil society that we were trying to support. The presence of NGOs prolongs the government
from having to rebuild the country and repair its dilapidated
infrastructure. When NGOs give handouts,
it competes with local vendors and undermines small businesses, causing the
local economy to tank.
These very criticisms of the aid industry are the very reasons
which compelled me back into missions. In light of this, how do we do missions
differently? Check out the blog post below:
Sarah, awesome and brave. You inspire me. What do missions look like in light of what you are saying? To what degree are we perpetuating similar negative effects simply by our presence? How hard are we really thinking about these things? To my mind, not hard enough. Not because I see negativity, that's not true. But we don't assess the NGos around us as a practise. As for how we currently do missions, I see a need for a new direction that includes the research you have so generously shared out loud. JW
ReplyDelete